- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 09:04:02 -0700
- To: "Gian Sampson-Wild" <gian@tkh.com.au>
- Cc: public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org
This comment referred to SC 1.1.1 Loretta On 7/6/07, Gian Sampson-Wild <gian@tkh.com.au> wrote: > Comment 51: > > Source: http://www.w3.org/mid/001f01c695f9$31b504e0$9288b23a@tkhcomputer > (Issue ID: LC-1074) > > Example 3: Why isn't a long description required? > > Proposed Change: > > Add to example that a long description is required which gives the same > information as the image > > ---------------------------- > Response from Working Group: > ---------------------------- > > Since the animation is fully explained in text a longdesc would be redundant > and end up having the user who is blind listening to the description twice. > So the alternate text provides a short description and mentions that the > animation is described in the text that follows it. > > ---------------------------- > Response from GSW: > ---------------------------- > Can you please tell me which SC this refers to? > >
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 16:04:18 UTC