- From: Gian Sampson-Wild <gian@tkh.com.au>
- Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 01:03:29 +1000
- To: "'Loretta Guarino Reid'" <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Cc: <public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org>
Comment 51: Source: http://www.w3.org/mid/001f01c695f9$31b504e0$9288b23a@tkhcomputer (Issue ID: LC-1074) Example 3: Why isn't a long description required? Proposed Change: Add to example that a long description is required which gives the same information as the image ---------------------------- Response from Working Group: ---------------------------- Since the animation is fully explained in text a longdesc would be redundant and end up having the user who is blind listening to the description twice. So the alternate text provides a short description and mentions that the animation is described in the text that follows it. ---------------------------- Response from GSW: ---------------------------- Can you please tell me which SC this refers to?
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 15:03:45 UTC