- From: Gian Sampson-Wild <gian@tkh.com.au>
- Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 01:17:35 +1000
- To: "'Loretta Guarino Reid'" <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Cc: <public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org>
Comment 46: Source: http://www.w3.org/mid/001f01c695f9$31b504e0$9288b23a@tkhcomputer (Issue ID: LC-1069) Stylesheets: It could be argued that the sequence of content can always be programmatically determined- otherwise it could not be presented to the user in that particular sequence. Because 1.3.3 maps to checkpoint 6.1, it is obvious that what is meant by the WCAG2 SC is that if style sheets are used to manipulate the layout of text, then the layout without style sheets must present a meaningful alternative. However it can be argued that simply because a user agent (ie browser) can interpret the style sheet to present information in a certain way, that it is automatically programmatically determinable. Proposed Change: Clarify the SC 1.3.3 ---------------------------- Response from Working Group: ---------------------------- Please note that the the definition of programmatically determined specifically covers support by assistive technologies: "determined by software from author-supplied data provided in a way that different user agents, including assistive technologies, can extract and present this information to users in different modalities". CSS can be used to position items visually on a page. While the position is of course programatically determined, the reading order on the basis of CSS positioning is not, because CSS lacks layout concepts such as "previous" or "next" that would define, unambiguously, the proper reading order of a graphical layout. In theory, advanced heuristics might be able to extrapolate this information, but such approaches are not supported by current tools so this is not a sufficient technique at this time. Therefore, this success criterion does have relevance and it is recommended to follow the sufficient techniques provided. ---------------------------- Response from GSW: ---------------------------- If this is the case then I believe that the term "programmatically determined" should be replaced with something like "supported by AT". The term "programmatically determined" indicates that information can be determined programmatically which is not what it appears the Working Group means at this point.
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 15:17:48 UTC