- From: Gian Sampson-Wild <gian@tkh.com.au>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 23:51:25 +1000
- To: "'Loretta Guarino Reid'" <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Cc: <public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org>
Comment 89: Source: http://www.w3.org/mid/001f01c695f9$31b504e0$9288b23a@tkhcomputer (Issue ID: LC-1116) Examples: The example implies that this SC requires that correctly filled out fields are kept available after reload - is this what this SC requires? Proposed Change: Clarify the SC ---------------------------- Response from Working Group: ---------------------------- You are right that the success criteria doesn't require all correctly filled out fields to be kept available after reload. We don't believe we can require this at Level A, however, as there may be valid reasons, such as security and privacy, for not doing this. We have modified the example to use an alert instead of a page reload. If authors use this technique, a good benefit is that the user's original entries will be preserved even though the success criterion doesn't require it. ---------------------------- Response from GSW: ---------------------------- Does this alert require client-side scripting and if so, should WCAG2 be requiring the use of a particular technology? Is it possible to say "keep fields after reload unless information has security or privacy requirements and instead then provide an alert"? If you can remind me of which SC this refers to I can comment more accurately.
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 13:51:37 UTC