- From: Ben Caldwell <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:40:04 -0500
- To: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- CC: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Hi Shawn, Your comment (included below) suggests that we organize WCAG 2.0 as in WCAG 1.0. Can you elaborate? Your proposed change suggests that we organize numerically, rather than grouping by priorities, but we were unsure exactly how this proposed change would impact the numbering and heading organization. Thanks much, -Ben WCAG 2.0 Comment Form wrote: > Name: Shawn Henry > Email: shawn@w3.org > Affiliation: W3C WAI > Document: W2 > Item Number: mapping > Part of Item: > Comment Type: general comment > Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): > Organizing by WCAG 1.0 Priorities makes it quite difficult to process the information. Topics (such as forms, tables) are split across different sections and tables. Checkpoints are not in order. > > > > If it was organized as in WCAG 1.0 (that is, numerically), it would be much easier to both understand the differences in how topics are addressed, and to find individual checkpoints. > > > > Proposed Change: > Organize as is in WCAG 1.0, that is, numerically, rather than grouping by priorities. > > -- Ben Caldwell | <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu> Trace Research and Development Center <http://trace.wisc.edu>
Received on Monday, 24 July 2006 19:38:22 UTC