- From: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 15:28:27 -0400
- To: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Cc: <public-comments-wcag20@w3.org>
At 11:46 PM -0500 6/27/06, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: >Did you mean for both of these to be 1.3.2? No. Sorry. Meant to be 1.3.2, 1.3.3. That is to say: Color-coded information must be visually evident in some non-color way (1.3.2) is a requirement that applies at the User Interface (to the rendered content). The requirement that meaning-important order can be programmatically determined (1.3.3) applies at the network interface (to the communicated content). Al > >Gregg > >------------------------ >Comment LC-1198 >Title: >Document: WCAG 2.0 Guidelines >Submitter: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org> >Comment Type: substantive >Location: <http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/complete.html> >Comment: >Distinguish requirements that apply at the User Interface, i.e. in >the Rendered Content, from requirements that apply at the network >interface, i.e. in the Communicated Content. > >The latter is defined by how the content is represented as it passes >from the author and server's automation to the user's automation. > >We may be able to resurrect the notion of a [generic] document >object model as a slightly stronger statement of the 4.1 'clean >parse' language and tie "programmatically determined" clauses there. > >Proposed Change: > >Distinguish requirements that apply at the User Interface, i.e. in >the Rendered Content, from requirements that apply at the network >interface, i.e. in the Communicated Content. > >1.3.2 is an example of the former. >1.3.2 is an example of the latter. >Status: open >Working Group Notes: >Resolution: >Related Issues: >Assigned To: Nobody >Last Edited: 20060623192430
Received on Monday, 3 July 2006 19:29:04 UTC