- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 21:41:40 -0500
- To: "'David Keech'" <david.keech@bsi-global.com>
- Cc: <public-comments-wcag20@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 2 July 2006 02:41:49 UTC
Hi David In your comments your #12 was 12. The role of blinking and flashing content is confused - http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/complete.html#time-limits-blink and http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/#seizure-does-not-violate-terms We do not understand what you mean. Blinking is a distraction problem. Content that blinks can cause problems for some users. If it stops within 3 seconds - it only provides a delay not a barrier. And the blinking can be a useful tool for all users including people with cognitive disabilities or low vision to draw their attention to something important. Blinking at slower than 4 per second is not as seizure problem. Flashing on the otherhand refers to flashes that are more than 3 per second. This is a seizure problem even for a second. To keep these separate we refer to one as blinking and one as flashing. (At least we tried to) >From your comment it sounds like you found a place where one of them is crosslinked with a technique for the other. Or perhaps you found something else. If you could clarify where you think we have these confused or used the wrong term it would be most helpful. Or does this answer your question? Thank you. Gregg Co-chair
Received on Sunday, 2 July 2006 02:41:49 UTC