- From: Trevor Barton <trevor.barton@admin.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 17:05:33 +0100
- To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Dear all, I have scanned WCAG 2.0 draft with interest. My personal opinion (I cannot speak for others at the University of Oxford, or for the university here) is that there should be 3 levels of conformance as with WCAG 1.0. In fact, if you can manage to keep the approach and format as close as you can to WCAG 1.0 I think it would be appreciated by everyone. WCAG 1.0 may have been published in 1999, but (perhaps unbelievably) it is still new to some people involved in web publishing. If you can respond to the criticisms as well as make it clear that the overall goal posts have not shifted, it will make it easier for those of us who have to raise awareness about standards in web publishing, and then explain that those standards have recently been updated. Yours sincerely, Trevor. =================== Trevor Barton World Wide Web Officer Public Relations Office University of Oxford Tel: 01865 280546 Web: http://www.ox.ac.uk/
Received on Thursday, 21 July 2005 02:37:08 UTC