- From: Michael Smith <miksmith@attglobal.net>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 22:32:43 -0700
- To: "public-colorweb@w3.org" <public-colorweb@w3.org>
Hi colorweb members. Using extended-linear-srgb seems intuitive when colors are inside sRGB gamut, if I want a yellow that is twice as bright as a regular bright sRGB yellow, I use (r,g,b)=(2,2,0) instead of (r,g,b)=(1,1,0). What if I want my application to use a nice saturated BT.2020 yellow instead, which is out-of-sRGB gamut, for example (r,g,b)=(2,2,0) in BT.2020 linear would translate to (r,g,b)=(2.145699727, 2.016698845, -0.237459323) in extended-linear-srgb with a negative blue value. Do we really expect users to specify negative color values? I'm concerned that will be non-intuitive to users without a color science background. Or maybe we intend users to only feel comfortable with extended-linear-srgb when colors are inside sRGB gamut? Thanks, Mike
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2021 05:40:17 UTC