- From: Rain Michaels <rainb@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 15:50:03 -0400
- To: Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com>, Lisa Seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
- Cc: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJO5HutJY27uOw6NQT=wFYJ9ZUhQb6NeHcpejtiqY-mSAyGiVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Lisa, We covered this is the COGA Task Force meeting today, and the group agreed with the following: - Yes, your two track approach makes sense as our path forward for issue papers. This is the right direction. - The group agreed that we would like to make sure there is a note included at the top of all of the issue papers that are wiki pages, which says something like "This is a wiki page maintained by the COGA Task force, and not an official W3C note" -- then there would be a link to the formal W3C notes. - We aren't sure that the language in that proposed note is the right language. - Next steps - Rain will put together a spreadsheet we can use to code the issue papers and track their prioritization - Becca will review that spreadsheet and improve it - Once we have it, we can use it to determine which issue papers we are doing first, and who will take leadership on each that we are committing to Link to the discussion in our meeting minutes: https://www.w3.org/2023/10/16-coga-minutes.html#t03 Rain On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 3:50 AM Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Folks > Based on the survey and our discussion I believe we wanted to publish our > next versions of issue papers as a W3C note. > > I would like to propose that we publish a new draft of our issue papers > with papers that we want to become a W3C note. That means going through a > wider review process. I suggest each issue paper is published as a > separate module so that it stays manageable. > > Because this is a lot of work I suggest that we have two tracks > > - Track one: Papers to be included in our formal W3C Note. This should > be our new papers, and papers we have updated > - Track two: Older papers that we are not updating, we can put on our > wiki. I understand that we can point to our wiki in the note. but need to > be very clear that these are out of date. We can update them and include > them as additional modules later. > > The next steps will be > > 1. To decide if this is the right direction > 2. To decide which old issue papers we want to include in the first > round of publications. Our old issue papers are only published as an > editors draft. see https://w3c.github.io/coga/issue-papers/ > > Let me know what you think > All the best > > Lisa Seeman-Horwitz > > LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter > <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa> >
Received on Monday, 16 October 2023 19:50:46 UTC