- From: Rain Michaels <rainb@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 07:49:53 -0800
- To: Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Pascalides, Justine E" <JPascalides@ets.org>, public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJO5HuseGQphmTMrkSdF7n_Rj6g=i2+qjv3Pz-JewGzNhXTcRg@mail.gmail.com>
Yes, I will make a mockup for Help users understand with clear text and images? On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 7:38 AM Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Rain > > Can you make a mock up for Help users understand with clear text and > images? > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 4:27 PM Rain Michaels <rainb@google.com> wrote: > >> Thank you so much for sharing this, Justine! My apologies for taking a >> few days to reply. >> >> My thoughts/notes: >> >> *Ensure processed do not rely on memory *still needs work >> >> - It doesn't match the aesthetic style of the others and stands out >> as odd >> - It doesn't actually follow the mockup we decided on (with the >> stickies inside of the thought bubble) >> - It isn't very clear because it is a lot of visual information in a >> tiny space, especially with all of the details of the brain >> - Is there a reason not to use the one that I mocked up instead (option >> B >> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aRoYev1aAIHhIq37Itt96ueBwLh5zXMUeJBYxL0MCkQ/edit#>)? >> The originating art that I pulled together was sourced from nounproject, so >> it would be simple to credit. If we feel that one is also still a bit >> cluttered, I can work on it a bit more to give it more breathing space and >> clarity >> >> *Provide support for different ways to understand content* is confusing >> and aesthetically jarring. I realize this one was agreed on well before I >> became involved, but I'd like to suggest that I take a stab at coming up >> with a less confusing option. I've looked at previous iterations from the >> "older versions" document, and don't have a good creative solution yet, but >> am happy to make this an action item today or tomorrow. >> >> *Help users understand with clear text and images*: I can live with this >> one as it is, but I think we can do better. The icon feels unbalanced, and >> to me looks like it is proposing a long blob of text rather than short >> manageable chunks. I can also take on an action item to mock up a couple >> suggested alternatives on this one if that seems helpful. >> >> Finally, looking at this layout, and thinking about our actual >> recommendations, I'd like to propose that we make a layout change. I've >> added a suggestion to the bottom of the document you shared >> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/11MvYiuuCLb03tlg6aE_pXqE3WxA8M2eCcs75L5s9ZpI/edit#> >> . >> >> Rain >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 6:04 AM Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Fantastic job, Thanks so much! >>> >>> some small comments >>> >>> 1. Can the use and avoid (good and bad) icons be separated? >>> >>> The icons for Ensure processes do not rely on memory and Ensure >>> processes do not rely on memory seem less clear then we thought they >>> would. Can the artists take another look at them? Two suggestions: >>> >>> - Help users understand what things are and how to use them - maybe >>> we need lass of the hand and more of the other elements? >>> - Maybe if the outline for the memory icon was clearer >>> >>> All the best >>> >>> Lisa >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 10:10 PM Pascalides, Justine E < >>> JPascalides@ets.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The latest icons are now available on Google docs (link below). Is >>>> everyone comfortable with the current state? I’ve inserted the icons into >>>> the Summary text to give a clear representation of how they will appear in >>>> Content Usable. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/11MvYiuuCLb03tlg6aE_pXqE3WxA8M2eCcs75L5s9ZpI/edit >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Justine >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Justine Pascalides >>>> >>>> Technology, Accessibility, and Innovation >>>> >>>> ETS | Assessment and Learning Technology Development >>>> >>>> Ph: 609-683-2213 <(609)%20683-2213> | Email: jpascalides@ets.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or >>>> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom >>>> it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail >>>> in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or >>>> take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete >>>> it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. >>>> >>>> Thank you for your compliance. >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>
Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2021 15:50:44 UTC