Re: Icons

Yes, I will make a mockup for Help users understand with clear text and
images?

On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 7:38 AM Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Rain
>
> Can you make a mock up for Help users understand with clear text and
> images?
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 4:27 PM Rain Michaels <rainb@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Thank you so much for sharing this, Justine! My apologies for taking a
>> few days to reply.
>>
>> My thoughts/notes:
>>
>> *Ensure processed do not rely on memory *still needs work
>>
>>    - It doesn't match the aesthetic style of the others and stands out
>>    as odd
>>    - It doesn't actually follow the mockup we decided on (with the
>>    stickies inside of the thought bubble)
>>    - It isn't very clear because it is a lot of visual information in a
>>    tiny space, especially with all of the details of the brain
>>    - Is there a reason not to use the one that I mocked up instead (option
>>    B
>>    <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aRoYev1aAIHhIq37Itt96ueBwLh5zXMUeJBYxL0MCkQ/edit#>)?
>>    The originating art that I pulled together was sourced from nounproject, so
>>    it would be simple to credit. If we feel that one is also still a bit
>>    cluttered, I can work on it a bit more to give it more breathing space and
>>    clarity
>>
>> *Provide support for different ways to understand content* is confusing
>> and aesthetically jarring. I realize this one was agreed on well before I
>> became involved, but I'd like to suggest that I take a stab at coming up
>> with a less confusing option. I've looked at previous iterations from the
>> "older versions" document, and don't have a good creative solution yet, but
>> am happy to make this an action item today or tomorrow.
>>
>> *Help users understand with clear text and images*: I can live with this
>> one as it is, but I think we can do better. The icon feels unbalanced, and
>> to me looks like it is proposing a long blob of text rather than short
>> manageable chunks. I can also take on an action item to mock up a couple
>> suggested alternatives on this one if that seems helpful.
>>
>> Finally, looking at this layout, and thinking about our actual
>> recommendations, I'd like to propose that we make a layout change. I've
>> added a suggestion to the bottom of the document you shared
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/11MvYiuuCLb03tlg6aE_pXqE3WxA8M2eCcs75L5s9ZpI/edit#>
>> .
>>
>> Rain
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 6:04 AM Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Fantastic job, Thanks so much!
>>>
>>> some small comments
>>>
>>> 1. Can the use and avoid (good and bad) icons be separated?
>>>
>>> The icons for Ensure processes do not rely on memory and Ensure
>>> processes do not rely on memory seem less clear then we thought they
>>> would. Can the artists take another look at them? Two suggestions:
>>>
>>>    - Help users understand what things are and how to use them  - maybe
>>>    we need lass of the hand and more of the other elements?
>>>    - Maybe if the outline for the memory icon was clearer
>>>
>>> All the best
>>>
>>> Lisa
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 10:10 PM Pascalides, Justine E <
>>> JPascalides@ets.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The latest icons are now available on Google docs (link below). Is
>>>> everyone comfortable with the current state? I’ve inserted the icons into
>>>> the Summary text to give a clear representation of how they will appear in
>>>> Content Usable.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/11MvYiuuCLb03tlg6aE_pXqE3WxA8M2eCcs75L5s9ZpI/edit
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Justine
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Justine Pascalides
>>>>
>>>> Technology, Accessibility, and Innovation
>>>>
>>>> ETS | Assessment and Learning Technology Development
>>>>
>>>> Ph: 609-683-2213 <(609)%20683-2213> | Email: jpascalides@ets.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
>>>> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom
>>>> it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail
>>>> in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or
>>>> take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete
>>>> it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your compliance.
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>

Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2021 15:50:44 UTC