Re: working on the image - try 2

Hi Steve

I do not think it is a good exercise for right now. We also need solid
research behind any new patterns or gaps.
In a few weeks we will considering what we should do next. do you want to
add this to the list?



On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:48 AM Steve Lee <stevelee@w3.org> wrote:

> Skye - It just occurred to me that it would be an interesting exercise
> to indicate which Design Guide Pattern each of your points matches. And
> if they are not, perhaps there are some gaps we need to look at filling.
> This would be a way to test out the Patterns in a fairly realistic
> scenario. Some points may be more WCAG or general good UI design, but
> for others you raise a cognitive issue which we can match against a
> pattern(s).
>
> However, as of now, some of the Patterns have recently been reworked for
> the coming release of Content Usable. This new content is in separate
> Google Docs until merged, so it takes a little more work to access.
> However, that said, the the latest draft in GitHub Pages has enough
> current info for understanding the Pattern.
>
> https://w3c.github.io/coga/content-usable/
>
> Would you be interested in doing this?
>
> Steve
>
> On 17/02/2021 03:36, Skye wrote:
> > Nice example - here are a few suggestions to make it even better:
> > Suggested navigation bar:
> >
> >   * Home - offer a simple way to get back to the beginning;
> >   * Categories - this seems to be more about different categories
> >     (friendship is misspelled)
> >   * Delivery - keep it simple and consistent; not necessary to specify
> >     "information" as every section contains information; but if there
> >     are different delivery or other options, that is different
> >   * Events
> >   * Contact - keep it simple and consistent; not necessary to specify
> "us"
> >
> > Please avoid using a white background (especially with dark/black text)
> > as that challenges certain people with Dyslexia, light sensitivity,
> > Irlen Syndrome, etc.
> >
> > Red (hues) should only be used sparingly for emphasis or else it is
> > essentially shouting (between visually off-putting to sensory overload)
> > at the site visitor; using red/dark pink for a large footer area is
> > visually excessive against all the flowers in red/pink and also does not
> > have enough contrastto (and neutralizes) the pink flowers bordering it
> >
> > For easier/quicker comprehension (and visual appeal); better to just
> > have "Locally Sourced" and "Fresh Cut Daily" in large text instead of
> > phrasing as a sentence
> >
> > Not sure of the rationale for identifying the expected time to order -
> > if it really take 10 minutes (typo), that is not an effective process so
> > could scare away the customer especially one with different abilities
> > who may need even longer.
> >
> > Hope this helps~
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > *From:* Lisa Seeman [mailto:lisa1seeman@gmail.com]
> > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 16, 2021, 8:38 AM
> > *To:* public-cognitive-a11y-tf
> > *Subject:* working on the image - try 2
> >
> >>
> >> Hi Folks
> >>
> >> Here is the edits without the valentine's day section. It looks a bit
> >> better.
> >> Do we want to move ahead or leave it for the web version
> >>
> >> image.png
> >>
> >
>
>