Re: draft response for Accessibility of Remote Meetings

Hello Lisa,

If it is okay with you, please hold off on posting the issue. We have until
December 10th (Friday), and as discussed during the TF meeting this past
Thursday, Julie has already put a fair amount of work into a more readable,
consolidated version of the document we created. I believe Julie is nearly
done with this summary and will be ready to share shortly (today is a
weekend, so not sure she will be responding until tomorrow).

Thank you,

Rain



On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 5:51 AM Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Folks
>
> I was waiting for a draft response for *Accessibility of Remote Meetings*
>  - https://www.w3.org/TR/remote-meetings/   so we can post it
> tomorrow morning. As this is urgent, I hope no one minds if I made a draft
> to get us started.
>
> Based on our discussions and the  shared feedback document: COGA TF
> review of APA Remove Meetings working draft (November 2021)
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WIcQbQXI9qhfqONFI9kLuFDzVAoMGwPwlY1aAnAnBpQ/edit#>
>  :
>
>
>
> Issue ..
> Greeting APA.
> regarding  https://www.w3.org/TR/remote-meetings/ . Coga has reviewed the
> document and felt that the needs of people with learning and
> cognitive disabilities are not addressed ina significant way.
> Both so that hosts from our user groups  can host metaings , and that
> users  from our user groups can fully   participants in meetings hosted by
> others.
> We feal there is relevant content form  Making Content Useable
> <https://www.w3.org/TR/coga-usable/> for platforms, content creators etc,
> and that the relevance of content useable in all sections of the document. We
> feel each section needs to be reviewed with that in mind.
>
> We started collecting specific comments at docs.google.com
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WIcQbQXI9qhfqONFI9kLuFDzVAoMGwPwlY1aAnAnBpQ/edit#>
> , however, rather clogging up your github with hundreds of comments, we
> would ask that sections, "relevance of Making Content Useable
> <https://www.w3.org/TR/coga-usable/>" be created as  3.3.2, 4.1.2 , and
> sections on the topic be inserted appropriately including into sections,
> 1.2, 3.1,  5.1, and 5.2. We also suggest adding a section on brakeout
> sections
>
> Clearly this is a big task and we are happy to have a joint call to
> discuss how we can help.
>
>
> If this is ok with everyone I will put it in as an apa issue
> tomorrow morning
>
> All the best Lisa
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 6:50 PM Rain Michaels <rainb@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello COGA task force,
>>
>> This is a reminder that we will be reviewing the APA NAUR and Remote
>> meetings documents during our meeting this Thursday, December 2.
>>
>> Please read these documents and add thoughts ahead of time.
>>
>>    - *Natural Language Interface Accessibility User Requirements* -
>>    https://www.w3.org/TR/naur
>>       - Shared feedback document: COGA TF review of NAUR working draft
>>       (November 2021)
>>       <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1I6QEmpWwDN_cXeR6I5OX5UnlcZQ9M2NV4bMalaAThuM/edit?usp=sharing>
>>
>>
>>    - *Accessibility of Remote Meetings* -
>>    https://www.w3.org/TR/remote-meetings/
>>    - Shared feedback document: COGA TF review of APA Remove Meetings
>>       working draft (November 2021)
>>       <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WIcQbQXI9qhfqONFI9kLuFDzVAoMGwPwlY1aAnAnBpQ/edit#>
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Rain
>> [image: Google logo written with braille dots and ASL hands]
>> Rain Breaw Michaels
>> Interaction Designer, Central Accessibility
>> rainb@google.com
>>
>