- From: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 20:37:44 +0300
- To: "Glenda Sims" <glenda.sims@deque.com>
- Cc: "public-cognitive-a11y-tf" <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <164191dd692.df8e184d11298.8536288652205668495@zoho.com>
chair hat off, my opinion only. 1, this has changed the design requirement. Chunking in cognitive accessibility might have a bit of a different meaning. Not to say your point is not good. but the failure examples had already breakdown difficult passages into more comprehensible pieces or smaller parts. This is taking it all together with white space and symbols (a next step). Do we want to merge them? 2. "Break down walls of words." this is a metaphoric. not everyone understands them. I would use plane language to say what to do 3. We haven't decided to use persona quotes here. do we like this? (I often find them a bit patronizing). 4. Overall the structure is different. We had a plain text example instead of a list of cognitive functions as benefits. (we have a table at the end with the list of cognitive functions as benefits against each design requirement). This example has lots of sub headings (such as "clear design principle") Does the group prefer this template or the example that we are going with until now? Personally I think it clutters is up with jargon. Some web designers may like it but maybe it raises the bar. We need to include in content creators small content creators with one or two small sites. To help compare: Glenda's example: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WcfVALVq8PS9CLXUuAfV9Op0wXvI2yJYedj5jO23GTk/edit#heading=h.7zcg54sq08g3 template until now https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WcfVALVq8PS9CLXUuAfV9Op0wXvI2yJYedj5jO23GTk/edit#heading=h.729zggqj0s8d All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn, Twitter ---- On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 03:34:10 +0300 Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com> wrote ---- Howdy COGA, I volunteered to draft some content for the COGA Design Principle "Use Chunks". Version 1 of my draft can be seen here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WcfVALVq8PS9CLXUuAfV9Op0wXvI2yJYedj5jO23GTk/edit#heading=h.7zcg54sq08g3 I'd love to hear your feedback. Am I on the right track? How could what I've written be improved? Thanks tons, g glenda sims, cpacc | team a11y lead | 512.963.3773 deque systems accessibility for good
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2018 17:38:10 UTC