- From: Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 13:22:04 -0500
- To: "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
- Cc: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAH2ngER3Bf656xWMhg0OYwWg0H6_VH7yocx8sZiyFQVMHrR4yQ@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks for the feedback y'all.
Changes I've already made (because I understand what y'all said)
1. Removed "wall of words"
2. Removed "persona quote"
I think I'll need to have a conversation to fully understand the other
changes to make. Or we can scrape what I did, if I'm too far off target.
Onwards :)
g
*glenda sims* <glenda.sims@deque.com>, cpacc
<http://www.accessibilityassociation.org/certification> | team a11y lead
| 512.963.3773
deque systems <http://www.deque.com> accessibility for good
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 12:37 PM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:
> chair hat off, my opinion only.
>
> 1, this has changed the design requirement. Chunking in cognitive
> accessibility might have a bit of a different meaning. Not to say your
> point is not good. but the failure examples had already breakdown difficult
> passages into more comprehensible pieces or smaller parts. This is taking
> it all together with white space and symbols (a next step). Do we want to
> merge them?
>
> *2. "Break down walls of words." * this is a metaphoric. not everyone
> understands them. I would use plane language to say what to do
>
> 3. We haven't decided to use persona quotes here. do we like this? (I
> often find them a bit patronizing).
>
> 4. Overall the structure is different. We had a plain text example instead
> of a list of cognitive functions as benefits. (we have a table at the end
> with the list of cognitive functions as benefits against each design
> requirement).
> This example has lots of sub headings (such as "clear design principle")
> Does the group prefer this template or the example that we are going with
> until now? Personally I think it clutters is up with jargon. Some web
> designers may like it but maybe it raises the bar. We need to include in
> content creators small content creators with one or two small sites.
>
> To help compare:
>
> Glenda's example: https://docs.google.com/document/d/
> 1WcfVALVq8PS9CLXUuAfV9Op0wXvI2yJYedj5jO23GTk/edit#heading=h.7zcg54sq08g3
>
> template until now
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WcfVALVq8PS9CLXUuAfV9Op0wXvI2
> yJYedj5jO23GTk/edit#heading=h.729zggqj0s8d
>
> All the best
>
> Lisa Seeman
>
> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>
>
>
> ---- On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 03:34:10 +0300 *Glenda Sims
> <glenda.sims@deque.com <glenda.sims@deque.com>>* wrote ----
>
> Howdy COGA,
>
> I volunteered to draft some content for the COGA Design Principle "Use
> Chunks". Version 1 of my draft can be seen here:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WcfVALVq8PS9CLXUuAfV9Op0wXvI2
> yJYedj5jO23GTk/edit#heading=h.7zcg54sq08g3
>
> I'd love to hear your feedback. Am I on the right track? How could what
> I've written be improved?
>
> Thanks tons,
> g
>
> *glenda sims* <glenda.sims@deque.com>, cpacc
> <http://www.accessibilityassociation.org/certification> | team a11y
> lead | 512.963.3773
>
> deque systems <http://www.deque.com> accessibility for good
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2018 18:22:29 UTC