- From: Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 13:22:04 -0500
- To: "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
- Cc: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAH2ngER3Bf656xWMhg0OYwWg0H6_VH7yocx8sZiyFQVMHrR4yQ@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks for the feedback y'all. Changes I've already made (because I understand what y'all said) 1. Removed "wall of words" 2. Removed "persona quote" I think I'll need to have a conversation to fully understand the other changes to make. Or we can scrape what I did, if I'm too far off target. Onwards :) g *glenda sims* <glenda.sims@deque.com>, cpacc <http://www.accessibilityassociation.org/certification> | team a11y lead | 512.963.3773 deque systems <http://www.deque.com> accessibility for good On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 12:37 PM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote: > chair hat off, my opinion only. > > 1, this has changed the design requirement. Chunking in cognitive > accessibility might have a bit of a different meaning. Not to say your > point is not good. but the failure examples had already breakdown difficult > passages into more comprehensible pieces or smaller parts. This is taking > it all together with white space and symbols (a next step). Do we want to > merge them? > > *2. "Break down walls of words." * this is a metaphoric. not everyone > understands them. I would use plane language to say what to do > > 3. We haven't decided to use persona quotes here. do we like this? (I > often find them a bit patronizing). > > 4. Overall the structure is different. We had a plain text example instead > of a list of cognitive functions as benefits. (we have a table at the end > with the list of cognitive functions as benefits against each design > requirement). > This example has lots of sub headings (such as "clear design principle") > Does the group prefer this template or the example that we are going with > until now? Personally I think it clutters is up with jargon. Some web > designers may like it but maybe it raises the bar. We need to include in > content creators small content creators with one or two small sites. > > To help compare: > > Glenda's example: https://docs.google.com/document/d/ > 1WcfVALVq8PS9CLXUuAfV9Op0wXvI2yJYedj5jO23GTk/edit#heading=h.7zcg54sq08g3 > > template until now > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WcfVALVq8PS9CLXUuAfV9Op0wXvI2 > yJYedj5jO23GTk/edit#heading=h.729zggqj0s8d > > All the best > > Lisa Seeman > > LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter > <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa> > > > > ---- On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 03:34:10 +0300 *Glenda Sims > <glenda.sims@deque.com <glenda.sims@deque.com>>* wrote ---- > > Howdy COGA, > > I volunteered to draft some content for the COGA Design Principle "Use > Chunks". Version 1 of my draft can be seen here: > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WcfVALVq8PS9CLXUuAfV9Op0wXvI2 > yJYedj5jO23GTk/edit#heading=h.7zcg54sq08g3 > > I'd love to hear your feedback. Am I on the right track? How could what > I've written be improved? > > Thanks tons, > g > > *glenda sims* <glenda.sims@deque.com>, cpacc > <http://www.accessibilityassociation.org/certification> | team a11y > lead | 512.963.3773 > > deque systems <http://www.deque.com> accessibility for good > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2018 18:22:29 UTC