- From: Steve Lee <steve@opendirective.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 09:29:07 +0100
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAEsWMvRs9QLBMJ7_u9ew6KixFkNU6GSCahawZOjArfd0WqQKxw@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks Alastair, that's great. Steve Lee Sent from my mobile device Please excuse typing errors On Thu, 30 Aug 2018, 08:58 Alastair Campbell, <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > Hi Steve, > > That would be great, the latest version is here: > https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/gap-analysis/index.html > > I think the only difference with the editors draft is that Appendix A has > been moved out of the doc. > > Making a branch from here: https://github.com/w3c/coga/ (e.g. > stevelee-qa) would be great. > > To make it easier for others to review, I previously added a class of > 'update' to any element I changed, and put a bit of CSS in the head to > highlight it with a yellow background. (That's removed before merging.) > > For QA/typos and adding missing sections that is a good process. For > things that are more than QA, e.g. moving or removing things, I suggest > posting the suggestion here first. > > Kind regards, > > -Alastair > > > On 29/08/2018, 13:16, "Steve Lee" <steve@opendirective.com> wrote: > > In reading the published Roadmap and gap analysis I spotted a few > type-os > > How do you want them submitted? > > My natural inclination is to provide a PR with changes to > https://github.com/w3c/coga/blob/master/gap-analysis/index.html > but I doubt that is the correct process, especially as the source is > not mention in the published doc. > > Plus I was reading the > https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/WD-coga-gap-analysis-20180607/ and not the > editors draft. > > How should more detailed comments be passed on - via this list? > > Thanks > > Steve Lee > OpenDirective http://opendirective.com > > > >
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2018 08:29:47 UTC