- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 07:58:55 +0000
- To: Steve Lee <steve@opendirective.com>
- CC: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Hi Steve, That would be great, the latest version is here: https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/gap-analysis/index.html I think the only difference with the editors draft is that Appendix A has been moved out of the doc. Making a branch from here: https://github.com/w3c/coga/ (e.g. stevelee-qa) would be great. To make it easier for others to review, I previously added a class of 'update' to any element I changed, and put a bit of CSS in the head to highlight it with a yellow background. (That's removed before merging.) For QA/typos and adding missing sections that is a good process. For things that are more than QA, e.g. moving or removing things, I suggest posting the suggestion here first. Kind regards, -Alastair On 29/08/2018, 13:16, "Steve Lee" <steve@opendirective.com> wrote: In reading the published Roadmap and gap analysis I spotted a few type-os How do you want them submitted? My natural inclination is to provide a PR with changes to https://github.com/w3c/coga/blob/master/gap-analysis/index.html but I doubt that is the correct process, especially as the source is not mention in the published doc. Plus I was reading the https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/WD-coga-gap-analysis-20180607/ and not the editors draft. How should more detailed comments be passed on - via this list? Thanks Steve Lee OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2018 07:59:26 UTC