Re: proposal to publish it the gap analysis/roadmap with the improved tables

+1 look fit for purpose to me

Steve Lee
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com

On 18 September 2016 at 09:58, Michael Pluke <Mike.Pluke@castle-consult.com>
wrote:

> +1
> with a minor minor editorial. In the first cell of the "Authoring
> Techniques" column in table 1 there is a "not" missing in the following:
> "... how to have security that does use passwords..."
>
> Best regards
>
> Mike
>
> Sent using CloudMagic Email
> <https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=pi&cv=7.4.8&pv=9.0.2&source=email_footer_2>
>
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 9:16 am, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Folks
>
> The user tables of the gap analysis/roadmap  are at a much much better
> place then they were when we first requested that they should be published.
> I have also spell checked them :)
>
> As the gap analysis is not yet published anyway, I would like to propose
> we  publish it with the improved tables.
> (I know they still need work and more input from the task force but they
> are much better.)
>
>
> See https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/gap-analysis/table.html (new
> version - much much better)
> and https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/gap-analysis/#
> roadmap---tables-of-user-needs (old version)
>
> Please send +1 to approve or -1 (with the reason) to disagree.
>
> Thanks and...
>
>
> All the best
>
> Lisa Seeman
>
> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>
>
>