- From: Michael Pluke <Mike.Pluke@castle-consult.com>
- Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 08:58:54 +0000
- To: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
- CC: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 18 September 2016 08:59:24 UTC
+1 with a minor minor editorial. In the first cell of the "Authoring Techniques" column in table 1 there is a "not" missing in the following: "... how to have security that does use passwords..." Best regards Mike Sent using CloudMagic Email<https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=pi&cv=7.4.8&pv=9.0.2&source=email_footer_2> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 9:16 am, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote: Hi Folks The user tables of the gap analysis/roadmap are at a much much better place then they were when we first requested that they should be published. I have also spell checked them :) As the gap analysis is not yet published anyway, I would like to propose we publish it with the improved tables. (I know they still need work and more input from the task force but they are much better.) See https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/gap-analysis/table.html (new version - much much better) and https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/gap-analysis/#roadmap---tables-of-user-needs (old version) Please send +1 to approve or -1 (with the reason) to disagree. Thanks and... All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn<http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter<https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa> ________________________________
Received on Sunday, 18 September 2016 08:59:24 UTC