Re: proposal to publish it the gap analysis/roadmap with the improved tables

+1

Thaddeus
On Sep 19, 2016 9:01 AM, "Steve Lee" <steve@opendirective.com> wrote:

> +1 look fit for purpose to me
>
> Steve Lee
> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
>
> On 18 September 2016 at 09:58, Michael Pluke <
> Mike.Pluke@castle-consult.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>> with a minor minor editorial. In the first cell of the "Authoring
>> Techniques" column in table 1 there is a "not" missing in the following:
>> "... how to have security that does use passwords..."
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> Sent using CloudMagic Email
>> <https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=pi&cv=7.4.8&pv=9.0.2&source=email_footer_2>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 9:16 am, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Folks
>>
>> The user tables of the gap analysis/roadmap  are at a much much better
>> place then they were when we first requested that they should be published.
>> I have also spell checked them :)
>>
>> As the gap analysis is not yet published anyway, I would like to propose
>> we  publish it with the improved tables.
>> (I know they still need work and more input from the task force but they
>> are much better.)
>>
>>
>> See https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/gap-analysis/table.html (new
>> version - much much better)
>> and https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/gap-analysis/#roadmap
>> ---tables-of-user-needs (old version)
>>
>> Please send +1 to approve or -1 (with the reason) to disagree.
>>
>> Thanks and...
>>
>>
>> All the best
>>
>> Lisa Seeman
>>
>> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter
>> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>>
>>
>>
>

Received on Monday, 19 September 2016 16:39:42 UTC