Re: Help getting the issue papers to working draft.

Michael, will you be available to talk us though it on Mondays call?
All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter





---- On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 18:39:17 +0200 Michael Cooper<cooper@w3.org> wrote ---- 

  A complete list would be an infinite set. Some things I can think of right now:
  Spell check (for U.S. English)
 Grammar check - complete sentences, fragments, etc.
 Structure check - does the document flow in the optimal manner
 
 Code check - is the code well formed and resulting in the structure we intend, every sub-section wrapped in a <section> with a <hx> element
 
 Naked URIs need to be removed, wrapped around link text
 
 References need to follow W3C format, lots of the inline URIs actually should be treated as references
 Understandability of reading it top to bottom
 Good introduction sections
 Follow W3C manual of style http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/
 Cross references using relative URIs so we can adjust them easily
 No references to wiki or rawgit (temp resources)
 
  Michael
 
 Michael
 
 
 On 08/03/2016 9:10 AM, lisa.seeman wrote:
 
 5d9a876952.5879706686331314790@zoho.com" type="cite"> Michael, could you send a complete list of what we need to do with each issue paper. 
 
 All the best
 
 Lisa Seeman
 
 LinkedIn, Twitter