- From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 11:39:20 -0500
- To: "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2016 16:39:17 UTC
A complete list would be an infinite set. Some things I can think of
right now:
* Spell check (for U.S. English)
* Grammar check - complete sentences, fragments, etc.
* Structure check - does the document flow in the optimal manner
* Code check - is the code well formed and resulting in the structure
we intend, every sub-section wrapped in a <section> with a <hx> element
* Naked URIs need to be removed, wrapped around link text
* References need to follow W3C format, lots of the inline URIs
actually should be treated as references
* Understandability of reading it top to bottom
* Good introduction sections
* Follow W3C manual of style http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/
* Cross references using relative URIs so we can adjust them easily
* No references to wiki or rawgit (temp resources)
Michael
Michael
On 08/03/2016 9:10 AM, lisa.seeman wrote:
> Michael, could you send a complete list of what we need to do with
> each issue paper.
>
>
> All the best
>
> Lisa Seeman
>
> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2016 16:39:17 UTC