- From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 11:39:20 -0500
- To: "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2016 16:39:17 UTC
A complete list would be an infinite set. Some things I can think of right now: * Spell check (for U.S. English) * Grammar check - complete sentences, fragments, etc. * Structure check - does the document flow in the optimal manner * Code check - is the code well formed and resulting in the structure we intend, every sub-section wrapped in a <section> with a <hx> element * Naked URIs need to be removed, wrapped around link text * References need to follow W3C format, lots of the inline URIs actually should be treated as references * Understandability of reading it top to bottom * Good introduction sections * Follow W3C manual of style http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/ * Cross references using relative URIs so we can adjust them easily * No references to wiki or rawgit (temp resources) Michael Michael On 08/03/2016 9:10 AM, lisa.seeman wrote: > Michael, could you send a complete list of what we need to do with > each issue paper. > > > All the best > > Lisa Seeman > > LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter > <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2016 16:39:17 UTC