Re: Help getting the issue papers to working draft.

Yes

On 08/03/2016 2:55 PM, lisa.seeman wrote:
>
> Michael, will you be available to talk us though it on Mondays call?
>
> All the best
>
> Lisa Seeman
>
> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter 
> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>
>
>
>
> ---- On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 18:39:17 +0200 *Michael 
> Cooper<cooper@w3.org>* wrote ----
>
>     A complete list would be an infinite set. Some things I can think
>     of right now:
>
>       * Spell check (for U.S. English)
>       * Grammar check - complete sentences, fragments, etc.
>       * Structure check - does the document flow in the optimal manner
>       * Code check - is the code well formed and resulting in the
>         structure we intend, every sub-section wrapped in a <section>
>         with a <hx> element
>       * Naked URIs need to be removed, wrapped around link text
>       * References need to follow W3C format, lots of the inline URIs
>         actually should be treated as references
>       * Understandability of reading it top to bottom
>       * Good introduction sections
>       * Follow W3C manual of style http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/
>       * Cross references using relative URIs so we can adjust them easily
>       * No references to wiki or rawgit (temp resources)
>
>     Michael
>
>     Michael
>
>
>     On 08/03/2016 9:10 AM, lisa.seeman wrote:
>
>         5d9a876952.5879706686331314790@zoho.com" type="cite">
>         Michael, could you send a complete list of what we need to do
>         with each issue paper.
>
>
>         All the best
>
>         Lisa Seeman
>
>         LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter
>         <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>
>
>
>
>
>