Re: GPII standards work

Thanks John

Steve Lee
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com

On 9 February 2015 at 16:43, Rochford, John <john.rochford@umassmed.edu>
wrote:

>  Hi Steve,
>
>
>
> I just reviewed that content. It looks good.
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>
> John Rochford <http://profiles.umassmed.edu/profiles/display/132901>
> UMass Medical School/E.K. Shriver Center
> Director, INDEX Program
> Instructor, Family Medicine & Community Health
> www.DisabilityInfo.org
> Twitter: @ClearHelper <https://twitter.com/clearhelper>
>
> [image: Facebook Button]
> <http://www.facebook.com/pages/New-England-INDEXShriver-CenterUMass-Medical-School/227064920160>[image:
> Twitter Button] <https://twitter.com/NEINDEX> [image: WordPress Logo]
> <http://www.disabilityinfo.org/blog/>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Steve Lee [mailto:steve@opendirective.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, February 09, 2015 5:45 AM
> *To:* public-cognitive-a11y-tf
> *Subject:* GPII standards work
>
>
>
> FYI I've added the Cogg a11y details to the info on GPII standarisation
> work.
>
> Hopefully useful for impact assessment?
>
>
> http://wiki.gpii.net/w/Standardization_Roadmap#International_standardization
>
>    Steve Lee
> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
>

Received on Monday, 9 February 2015 17:13:40 UTC