Re: Proposal for structure of COGA documents

+1

Looks like a good idea. Lots of research and the Gap Analysis is getting lost.

Barry

Barry Johnson
******************* 

> On Sep 16, 2014, at 10:22 AM, "Rochford, John" <john.rochford@umassmed.edu> wrote:
> 
> + 1
> 
> John
> 
> On Sep 16, 2014 9:36 AM, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org> wrote:
> As we discussed on the call yesterday, I propose we split the document 
> the TF has been working on into two:
> 
> 1. User Research
> 2. Gap Analysis
> 
> The User Research document would contain research and information about 
> the needs of people with various cognitive and learning disabilities. 
> This is the bulk of the material in the current document.
> 
> The Gap Analysis would be a separate document, intentionally shorter. It 
> would focus on how technology meets the needs of people with cognitive 
> and learning disabilities, and where technology and guidelines do not 
> address those needs at present. It would reference the User Research 
> document for expanded information but would not replicate that 
> information. This would allow consumers of the Gap Analysis to focus 
> specifically on that content, but find the expanded information easily 
> if they need it.
> 
> The User Research document is currently more mature so would be the 
> first one we publish. The Gap Analysis would follow. The titles of these 
> documents is up for grabs, these are just placeholder references.
> 
> Michael
>