Re: Proposal for structure of COGA documents

Also sounds good to me.

Josh

Steve Lee wrote:
> +1
>
> Steve
>
> Autocomplete may have messed with my text
> On 16 Sep 2014 14:36, "Michael Cooper"<cooper@w3.org>  wrote:
>
>> As we discussed on the call yesterday, I propose we split the document the
>> TF has been working on into two:
>>
>> 1. User Research
>> 2. Gap Analysis
>>
>> The User Research document would contain research and information about
>> the needs of people with various cognitive and learning disabilities. This
>> is the bulk of the material in the current document.
>>
>> The Gap Analysis would be a separate document, intentionally shorter. It
>> would focus on how technology meets the needs of people with cognitive and
>> learning disabilities, and where technology and guidelines do not address
>> those needs at present. It would reference the User Research document for
>> expanded information but would not replicate that information. This would
>> allow consumers of the Gap Analysis to focus specifically on that content,
>> but find the expanded information easily if they need it.
>>
>> The User Research document is currently more mature so would be the first
>> one we publish. The Gap Analysis would follow. The titles of these
>> documents is up for grabs, these are just placeholder references.
>>
>> Michael
>>
>>
>

Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2014 14:09:30 UTC