RE: potential vision document for COGA

of course. PGA Matrix on cognitive preferences.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AkuU97mmSy0mdGMxRm5IdVVOUllhTThqeE9tYnZuMnc&usp=drive_web#gid=0


Please, by all means, take everything you can out of this on cognitive.




Rich Schwerdtfeger



From: "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
To: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
Cc: "Rochford, John" <john.rochford@umassmed.edu>, EA Draffan
            <ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, josephoconnor <josephoconnor@mac.com>,
            "Neil.Milliken" <neil.milliken@atos.net>,
            public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>,
            Steve Lee <steve@opendirective.com>
Date: 07/14/2014 09:43 AM
Subject: RE: potential vision document for COGA



Hi Rich
Can we add these as techniques?

All the best

Lisa Seeman

Athena ICT Accessibility Projects
LinkedIn, Twitter




---- On Mon, 14 Jul 2014 16:32:21 +0300 Richard
Schwerdtfeger<schwer@us.ibm.com> wrote ----

 One of the gaps I see is that addressing cognitive access does not default
 to basic UI adaptations. We are also going to need other service features
 that will be required. Here are just a few:
       Reminder services for people experiencing attention deficit or short
       term memory loss
       breadcrumbs "
       online glossaries for people with learning impairments and a vehicle
       for accessing them
       social collaboration solutions (instant messaging, etc. ) for users
       that prefer to operate in a group

 We need a defined strategy for these and other features will need to
 deliver - Specs., services, authoring tools, etc.

 The points I list came out of the Preference for Global Access project we
 are doing with NIDDR and the Department of Education.

 Best,
 Rich


 Rich Schwerdtfeger

 Inactive hide details for "Rochford, John" ---07/13/2014 03:19:06 PM---Hi
 Lisa and All, I think the roadmap is a good one. It is representative of
 the approach we have bee

 From: "Rochford, John" <john.rochford@umassmed.edu>
 To: "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, public-cognitive-a11y-tf <
 public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>, "Neil.Milliken" <neil.milliken@atos.net>
 Cc: josephoconnor <josephoconnor@mac.com>, EA Draffan <ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk
 >, Steve Lee <steve@opendirective.com>
 Date: 07/13/2014 03:19 PM
 Subject: RE: potential vision document for COGA





 Hi Lisa and All,

 I think the roadmap is a good one. It is representative of the approach we
 have been discussing during the past several conferences. I especially
 support documenting techniques by cognitive function, first those that are
 good for (almost all) groups, then those specific to only some groups.

 I don’t see a step I suggest should be added to the roadmap:
       ·      user testing and/or empirical research related to the
       techniques we are documenting.

 John

 John Rochford
 UMass Medical School/E.K. Shriver Center
 Director, INDEX Program
 Instructor, Family Medicine & Community Health
 http://www.DisabilityInfo.org

 Twitter: @ClearHelper

 From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com]
 Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 12:17 PM
 To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf; Neil.Milliken
 Cc: josephoconnor; EA Draffan; Steve Lee
 Subject: potential vision document for COGA

 I put up another document as a potential vision document  to share what I
 see as our collective thoughts  on where we could be going. It also shows
 how some of  the different pieces and  documents fit together.

 It is important because the sections of the gap analysis we are working on
 needs to support what we might want to do.

 Let me know were you think changes are needed. It is just a first draft
 for discussion purposes.

 Please take a look
 http://accessibility.athena-ict.com/cognitive/VisionCoga1.html


 All the best

 Lisa Seeman

 Athena ICT Accessibility Projects
 LinkedIn, Twitter