- From: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 17:39:55 +0300
- To: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: "Rochford, John" <john.rochford@umassmed.edu>, EA Draffan <ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, josephoconnor <josephoconnor@mac.com>, "Neil.Milliken" <neil.milliken@atos.net>, public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>, Steve Lee <steve@opendirective.com>
- Message-Id: <1473550d548.5937925865398432317.8718481921142317635@zoho.com>
Hi Rich Can we add these as techniques? All the best Lisa Seeman Athena ICT Accessibility Projects LinkedIn, Twitter ---- On Mon, 14 Jul 2014 16:32:21 +0300 Richard Schwerdtfeger<schwer@us.ibm.com> wrote ---- One of the gaps I see is that addressing cognitive access does not default to basic UI adaptations. We are also going to need other service features that will be required. Here are just a few: Reminder services for people experiencing attention deficit or short term memory loss breadcrumbs " online glossaries for people with learning impairments and a vehicle for accessing them social collaboration solutions (instant messaging, etc. ) for users that prefer to operate in a group We need a defined strategy for these and other features will need to deliver - Specs., services, authoring tools, etc. The points I list came out of the Preference for Global Access project we are doing with NIDDR and the Department of Education. Best, Rich Rich Schwerdtfeger "Rochford, John" ---07/13/2014 03:19:06 PM---Hi Lisa and All, I think the roadmap is a good one. It is representative of the approach we have bee From: "Rochford, John" <john.rochford@umassmed.edu> To: "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>, "Neil.Milliken" <neil.milliken@atos.net> Cc: josephoconnor <josephoconnor@mac.com>, EA Draffan <ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, Steve Lee <steve@opendirective.com> Date: 07/13/2014 03:19 PM Subject: RE: potential vision document for COGA Hi Lisa and All, I think the roadmap is a good one. It is representative of the approach we have been discussing during the past several conferences. I especially support documenting techniques by cognitive function, first those that are good for (almost all) groups, then those specific to only some groups. I don’t see a step I suggest should be added to the roadmap: · user testing and/or empirical research related to the techniques we are documenting. John John Rochford UMass Medical School/E.K. Shriver Center Director, INDEX Program Instructor, Family Medicine & Community Health http://www.DisabilityInfo.org Twitter: @ClearHelper From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 12:17 PM To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf; Neil.Milliken Cc: josephoconnor; EA Draffan; Steve Lee Subject: potential vision document for COGA I put up another document as a potential vision document to share what I see as our collective thoughts on where we could be going. It also shows how some of the different pieces and documents fit together. It is important because the sections of the gap analysis we are working on needs to support what we might want to do. Let me know were you think changes are needed. It is just a first draft for discussion purposes. Please take a look http://accessibility.athena-ict.com/cognitive/VisionCoga1.html All the best Lisa Seeman Athena ICT Accessibility Projects LinkedIn, Twitter
Received on Monday, 14 July 2014 14:42:27 UTC