Hi Lisa and All, I think the roadmap is a good one. It is representative of the approach we have been discussing during the past several conferences. I especially support documenting techniques by cognitive function, first those that are good for (almost all) groups, then those specific to only some groups. I don’t see a step I suggest should be added to the roadmap: · user testing and/or empirical research related to the techniques we are documenting. John John Rochford UMass Medical School/E.K. Shriver Center Director, INDEX Program Instructor, Family Medicine & Community Health http://www.DisabilityInfo.org Twitter: @ClearHelper From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 12:17 PM To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf; Neil.Milliken Cc: josephoconnor; EA Draffan; Steve Lee Subject: potential vision document for COGA I put up another document as a potential vision document to share what I see as our collective thoughts on where we could be going. It also shows how some of the different pieces and documents fit together. It is important because the sections of the gap analysis we are working on needs to support what we might want to do. Let me know were you think changes are needed. It is just a first draft for discussion purposes. Please take a look http://accessibility.athena-ict.com/cognitive/VisionCoga1.html All the best Lisa Seeman Athena ICT Accessibility Projects<http://accessibility.athena-ict.com/default.shtml> LinkedIn<http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter<https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
Received on Sunday, 13 July 2014 20:18:53 UTC