- From: Liddy Nevile <liddy@sunriseresearch.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 09:58:15 +1000
- To: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
- Cc: "public-cognitive-a11y-tf" <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>, "Deborah Dahl" <dahl@conversational-technologies.com>, "Jim Allan" <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>, "steve.jacobs" <steve.jacobs@ideal-group.org>, "Joseph K O'Connor" <josephoconnor@mac.com>, Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo <emmanuelle@sidar.org>, Elle Waters <elle@simplyaccessible.com>, Cynthia Jimes <cynthia@iskme.org>, <jfeng@towson.edu>, " Avi Golden" <agolden@pobox.com>, Chuck Hitchcock <chitchcock@cast.org>, "Lewis, Clayton (Contractor)" <Clayton.Lewis@ed.gov>, "easeofuse@ca.rr.com" <easeofuse@ca.rr.com>, <frederick.boland@nist.gov>, Jonathan Lazar <jlazar@towson.edu>, "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Rossi Setchi <Setchi@cardiff.ac.uk>
mmm... I have been looking at the gap analysis we are doing and some have done very good work. I am wondering, however, if we can use that as a backdrop to a more functional approach to inclusion - are we intending that? I imagine that we do not want to be working on 'conditions' of people so much as on common functional requirements. For a start, I think this is the more useful approach and, being interested in how we can use metadata to help with solutions, I would want to be sure that we can work from functional requirements. Is there room for a short discussion about this on the agenda for the next meeting? Liddy
Received on Monday, 21 April 2014 23:58:39 UTC