- From: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 11:21:15 +0200
- To: Dennis Hamilton <dennis.hamilton@acm.org>
- Cc: "public-change@w3.org" <public-change@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAK2GfEfXnL6MZxKrYiJmjL-rfKwV+SRr2Cp4tEgwOS4VMbEhg@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks Dennis, I want also to hear more about RDF in this area Here is the use cases I foresee : * extending Dublin Core * providing a serialization in RDF of the list of changes (bear in mind that we will provide many serialization XML-with-PI, XML-with-Element, etc.) If we see other use cases, I will be happy to consider them Regards, Mohamed On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton < dennis.hamilton@acm.org> wrote: > *[The W3C site seems to be a little pokey about posting the message it was > sitting on until I gave my permission. Here is what may end up being a > repost.]* > > > > RDF was touched on a little in discussions at DChanges 2014. > > > > One concern is that RDF directed into an XML document and/or embedded into > the XML document is technically possible but the loose-coupling raises > difficulties. If the application of the XML document is only passively > aware of the RDF usage, changes to the XML document might preserve the RDF > yet it can become semantically inconsistent as a result of the changes. > > > > This seems to apply in cases where RDF injection is a kind of appendage to > the use of XML for document representation and applications do not provide > an integrated treatment. > > > > My thought is that integrated treatment might be very difficult because, > in some manner there can be quite a disparity between the levels of > abstraction of the XML document versus what the RDF is intended to elicit. > > > > Of course, one might inject change-tracking into an <RDF:rdf> element, > which is different than the case where there has to be coordinated change > in both the RDF and modification of the non-RDF XML document structure and > text. > > > > This may become aggravated the farther the model of the application is > from the level of abstraction of RDF and XML. In that case, more and > more of this becomes invisible to users at the application level and > coordinated change with underlying RDF seems not to be handled in any > general way at this time. > > > > - Dennis > > > > *From:* Innovimax SARL [mailto:innovimax@gmail.com <innovimax@gmail.com>] > *Sent:* Saturday, September 20, 2014 02:25 > *To:* public-change@w3.org > *Subject:* Technologies > > > > Dear all, > > I started to collect the technologies that could interact at any level > with change tracking > > Here are a few so far > https://www.w3.org/community/change/wiki/Technologies > > - XML > - Namespaces > - HTLM5 > - XPath > - JSON > - RDF > - XQuery Update > - EXI > - Dublin core > > Please fill free to add (and perhaps links also) > > Mohamed > > > -- > Innovimax SARL > Consulting, Training & XML Development > 9, impasse des Orteaux > 75020 Paris > Tel : +33 9 52 475787 > Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 > http://www.innovimax.fr > RCS Paris 488.018.631 > SARL au capital de 10.000 € > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Sunday, 21 September 2014 09:21:43 UTC