- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 10:50:25 +0100
- To: "Chris Lilley" <chris@w3.org>, public-cdf@w3.org
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 19:26:49 +0100, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote: > There are no extensions to the param element, although the param element > is indeed used in other sections. Ah, right. I suppose they're extensions to SVG in some way. > Please review the current specification, which we believe already has > the normative wording you request. Specifically, it says: > > With the "animation" parameter set to "onfocusevent", > > * the child content must render the first frame for time zero (0). > > * If the root element does not have focus, then the root element > must then be paused at time zero(0). > > * Upon receiving focus, the root element is resumed. > > * Upon losing focus, the root element is paused. > > After discussion, 'is' will be replaced by 'shall be' in the third and > fourth bullets. I thought <object> would get focus and not <object>.contentDocument.documentElement. Why's that? I don't really understand how this would work. > Please let us know within two weeks if this revised wording does not > satisfy your comment. See above. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 9 November 2006 09:50:41 UTC