- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 19:26:49 +0100
- To: public-cdf@w3.org
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Hello public-cdf, Anne wrote: > It is unclear to me how > <http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-WICD-20051219/#focus-event-triggered-child-animations> > interacts with the earlier section about extensions to the <param> > element. There are no extensions to the param element, although the param element is indeed used in other sections. > What happens for example when both are set? As section 9.2 Timeline Initialization says http://www.w3.org/2004/CDF/specs/CDR/wp-1/wicd.html#timeline-initialization Frozen and static renderings have no timeline and thus cannot be started and stopped. If they have no timeline then, clearly, animations in that timeline cannot be started and stopped either. The CDF WG discussed this on todays telcon and believe the specification is already clear on this point. Please let us know within two weeks if you disagree with this resolution. > In addition, this > sections lacks the same normative wording and exact terminology as the > other. Please review the current specification, which we believe already has the normative wording you request. Specifically, it says: With the "animation" parameter set to "onfocusevent", * the child content must render the first frame for time zero (0). * If the root element does not have focus, then the root element must then be paused at time zero(0). * Upon receiving focus, the root element is resumed. * Upon losing focus, the root element is paused. After discussion, 'is' will be replaced by 'shall be' in the third and fourth bullets. Please let us know within two weeks if this revised wording does not satisfy your comment. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2006 18:27:13 UTC