- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 14:03:08 +0100
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: public-cdf@w3.org
On Thursday, November 9, 2006, 10:50:25 AM, Anne wrote: AvK> On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 19:26:49 +0100, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote: >> There are no extensions to the param element, although the param element >> is indeed used in other sections. AvK> Ah, right. I suppose they're extensions to SVG in some way. No, they are just a regular xhtml element and its two regular old attribute values. >> Please review the current specification, which we believe already has >> the normative wording you request. Specifically, it says: >> With the "animation" parameter set to "onfocusevent", >> * the child content must render the first frame for time zero (0). >> * If the root element does not have focus, then the root element >> must then be paused at time zero(0). >> * Upon receiving focus, the root element is resumed. >> * Upon losing focus, the root element is paused. >> After discussion, 'is' will be replaced by 'shall be' in the third and >> fourth bullets. AvK> I thought <object> would get focus If that were the case, the child document would still not have focus and thus, the animations would not trigger. AvK> and not AvK> <object>.contentDocument.documentElement. Why's that? I don't really AvK> understand how this would work. See above. >> Please let us know within two weeks if this revised wording does not >> satisfy your comment. AvK> See above. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Thursday, 9 November 2006 13:03:24 UTC