- From: Steve K Speicher <sspeiche@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:45:36 -0400
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: public-cdf@w3.org
Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote on 05/04/2006 03:06:32 PM: > On May 4, 2006, at 10:57 AM, Chris Lilley wrote: > > On Thursday, May 4, 2006, 7:45:37 PM, Bjoern wrote: > > BH> * Kevin E Kelly wrote: > > One example of such a comment is: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0003.html > This was addressed, see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2006Apr/0014.html > As far as I can tell, this comment has not been formally addressed in > the now almost 9 months since it was submitted. Or at least there is > no archived record of this. This is only one of many examples. I > don't think a general statement that lots of changes have been made > satisfies the requirement to formally address substantive review > comments. Regards, Steve Speicher
Received on Tuesday, 16 May 2006 17:46:00 UTC