- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 21:18:08 +0200
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: public-cdf@w3.org
* Chris Lilley wrote: >BH> * the Working Group formally addressed all comments before publishing >BH> the four last call announcements > >I wonder if you could point to to the specific place in the Process >document that requires a Working Group to respond to all comments on a >previous Last Call, as opposed to saying that there have been many >changes as a result of comments and starting a new Last call? This is >particularly important in the case where a specification has been >refactored into multiple specifications, or otherwise been subject to >major changes in structure. There was no previous last call for the documents I am concerned about, so I'm afraid this discussion would be offtopic here. If you think the Process document is unclear about such an important matter, I would appreciate if you could register your concerns with the Advisory Board. >BH> * where I can read up on why the Working Group has not been able to >BH> meet W3C's requirements for regular publication of updated drafts > >I invite you to look at the volume of comments submitted,many by >yourself, and reflect for a moment that responding to each one takes >more or less time; thus the time between drafts is O(n) where n is the >number of comments. I wonder if you could point to to the specific place in the Process document that implies this relationship between volume of comments and meeting W3C's requirements for regular publication? In any case, I would rather learn such details from the mandatory public status report. You don't happen to know where I can find it? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Thursday, 4 May 2006 19:18:32 UTC