- From: Steve K Speicher <sspeiche@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 15:54:24 -0400
- To: codedread@gmail.com
- Cc: public-cdf@w3.org
Hi Jeff, replies inlined... kekelly@us.ibm.com wrote on 09/06/2005 04:49:48 PM: > Thank you very much for your constructive and well thought out > comments on the Compound Document Format Framework and WICD Profile > 1st Public Draft. We are processing your comments now and will be > following up with specific feedback to each of your issues. We have processed your comments some time ago. We are just finally getting around to replying. > <object> not the only way to reference other formats > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0001.html We have address this in the latest editor's draft: http://www.w3.org/2004/CDF/specs/CDR/wp-1/wicd.xhtml#referencing-child-documents > ReferencedDocument interface typo > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0002.html See have rewriten these sections to reference the Windows Object spec http://www.w3.org/2004/CDF/specs/CDR/wp-1/cdf.xhtml#child-to-parent-dom-access > Focus Ring > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0003.html The section "Focus Navigation" has been updated and is now an informative section http://www.w3.org/2004/CDF/specs/CDR/wp-1/wicd.xhtml#focus-navigation > Appendix D MIME Type thoughts > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0004.html We have decided to only recommend the usage of the profile parameter: http://www.w3.org/2004/CDF/specs/CDR/wp-1/wicd-full.xhtml#identification http://www.w3.org/2004/CDF/specs/CDR/wp-1/wicd-mobile.xhtml#identification > SVG Animated Backgrounds > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0005.html This is clarified by stating that UAs may support animated background images: http://www.w3.org/2004/CDF/specs/CDR/wp-1/wicd.xhtml#scalable-background-image > What happens to the <object> data attribute? > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0006.html Link activation section no longer exists in the latest editor's copy, therefore this issue doesn't exist anymore. http://www.w3.org/2004/CDF/Group/specs/CDR/wp1/wicd.xml > Rightsizing cases > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0007.html We have updated the now WICD Core section on right-sizing to address these and other issues: http://www.w3.org/2004/CDF/Group/specs/CDR/wp1/wicd.xml#rightsizing > Another typo > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0031.html Latest copy has been fixed http://www.w3.org/2004/CDF/Group/specs/CDR/wp1/wicd.xml#rightsizing > DOM Navigation Question > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0032.html We have since replaced these sections with references to the upcoming Window Object spec. We have concluded that attempting to address security concerns may be better handled by a separate activity and up to UAs to implement appropriate security measures (as they would do anyway) http://www.w3.org/2004/CDF/Group/specs/CDR/wp1/cdf.xml#dom > When ?amination? equals ?stop? > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0033.html This section has been removed from the latest editor's draft and LC public working draft, therefore there is no longer a problem with the wording. http://www.w3.org/2004/CDF/Group/specs/CDR/wp1/wicd.xml > Background images as child documents > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0035.html Your issue has been addressed in the latest editor's draft: http://www.w3.org/2004/CDF/Group/specs/CDR/wp1/wicd.xml#referencing-child-documents If this does not satisfy your comments please respond within 2 weeks. Thanks, Steve Speicher on behalf of the CDF WG
Received on Wednesday, 5 April 2006 19:53:07 UTC