- From: Steve K Speicher <sspeiche@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 11:12:31 -0500
- To: Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-cdf@w3.org
Hi Jeff, It appears that you were commenting on our previous public draft at: http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CDR-20051121 See inline responses below... Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com> wrote on 01/30/2006 01:59:51 PM: > 1) "Compound Document Framework 1.0" (http://www.w3.org/TR/CDR/) is > actually titled "Compound Document by Reference Framework 1.0". CDI > is mentioned in this document. Section "1 Compound Document Framework" is intended to give a general overview of 'compound documents', which is why it refers to CDI. Section 2 is the section regarding CDR and associated normative text. We plan to have these sections titled 1 Compound Document Framework 1.0 2 Compound Document by Reference (CDR) > 2) 1.5 - missing informative or normative statement In LC public draft, this section has been removed > 3) Typos/Grammar: > 1.6 - "therefor" => "therefore" > 1.6.1 - "An different version number" => "A different version number" > 4) 1.6.1 - you mention TWICE that no specified version number means "1.0" In LC public draft, 1.6.* section has been completely rewritten. Thanks for your comments. Please let us know within 2 weeks if this does not address your comment. Regards, Steve Speicher on behalf of the CDF WG ACTION-418
Received on Wednesday, 8 March 2006 16:11:21 UTC