- From: Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 10:37:05 -0600
- To: "Alex Danilo" <alex@abbra.com>
- Cc: "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>, public-cdf@w3.org
My only real point of confusion was that I thought the "referencing element" was an <object> not, say, a <div>. Thus, I was confused how two SVG objects could be in that one <object>'s containing block. Regards, Jeff On 3/3/06, Alex Danilo <alex@abbra.com> wrote: > Hello Bjoern, > > The issues with the questions covered 2 main points: > > 1) The referencing of 2 SVG objects from one referencing element inside > a block. There are a great many HTML pages which reference a plurality > of images within a single containing block via use of the 'img' > element. This is no different. I can't see that the spec. requires > any additional text to state this. > 2) The other point was sizing of 2 objects to 100% and how they fit into > a containing block. This is well-defined in CSS and therefore need not > be duplicated in the WICD Core document. > > Best regards, > Alex > > --Original Message--: > >* Alex Danilo wrote: > >> Thanks for your comments. You ask a number of questions, I'll > >>try to address each of them. > > > >I'm afraid it's not really clear from your response what, if anything, > >has been changed in the draft to ensure that no other reader of the > >document would have the same questions, or why the Working Group thinks > >no changes are necessary. Could you elaborate on this? > >-- > >Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de > >Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de > >68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 3 March 2006 16:37:16 UTC