- From: Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:20:12 -0500
- To: public-cdf@w3.org
I am not satisfied with the cases you present for right-sizing in Section 2.4.1. In essence, I feel that the object width attribute specifies the object frame dimensions while the SVG width specifies the width of the child document inside the object frame (which can be accomodated via scrollbars if it is larger than the object frame. Here are the cases as I see them: <object width="100%">, <svg width="100%"> => result should be an object frame that covers the full width of the XHTML element containing the <object>, the SVG image inside should be the full width of the object frame <object width="100%">, <svg width="50%"> => result should be an object frame that covers the full width of the XHTML element containing the <object>, the SVG image inside should be half the width of the object frame (this is not a very useful case, but behavior can still be well-defined) <object width="100%">, <svg width="200px"> => result should be an object frame that is the full width of the XHTML element containing the <object>, the SVG image inside this frame should be 200 pixels (this may require the object frame to have a horizontal scrollbars depending upon the browser width) <object width="100px">, <svg width="100%"> => result should be an object frame that is 100 pixels wide, the SVG image inside this frame should be 100 pixels wide <object width="100px">, <svg width="200px"> => result should be an object frame that is 100 pixels wide, the SVG image inside this frame should be 200 pixels wide (this will require the object frame to have a horizontal scrollbar) Regards, Jeff Schiller
Received on Tuesday, 16 August 2005 14:20:17 UTC