W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cdf@w3.org > August 2005

Re: [WICD-oT-2] WICD review - specification naming

From: Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 10:57:40 -0500
Message-ID: <da131fde0508250857130d2526@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-cdf@w3.org


I agree this this specific instance is not a big deal, but I
wholeheartedly agree with Olivier's overall comments that the
documents give the feel that the WG hasn't sorted through "what to
call this thing" yet in clear enough terms.  CDF, WICD should be
reconciled asap as hinted at in Appendix D of "Compound Document
Framework 1.0 and WICD Profiles".


Robin Berjon wrote:
>olivier Thereaux wrote:
>> - content and documents following these profiles are called "WICD  
>> content" and "WICD document" in some sections of the spec. The  latter, 
>> with the acronym expanded, sounds strange.
>Actually this is not rare at all in English, and examples abound. Off 
>the top of my head: ATM machine, PIN number, HTML language, DSL line... 
>I wouldn't worry about it, I don't think that this specific instance is 
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2005 15:57:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:10:47 UTC