Re: [WICD-oT-2] WICD review - specification naming

Hi Jeff,

Jeff Schiller wrote:
> I agree this this specific instance is not a big deal, but I
> wholeheartedly agree with Olivier's overall comments that the
> documents give the feel that the WG hasn't sorted through "what to
> call this thing" yet in clear enough terms.  CDF, WICD should be
> reconciled asap as hinted at in Appendix D of "Compound Document
> Framework 1.0 and WICD Profiles".

Yes, sorry if I was unclear. I meant merely to address this small item, 
but I agree that the WG should be consistently wicked ;)

-- 
Robin Berjon
   Senior Research Scientist
   Expway, http://expway.com/

Received on Thursday, 25 August 2005 16:06:41 UTC