- From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 23:56:18 -0700
- To: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: Canvas <public-canvas-api@w3.org>, Mark Sadecki <mark@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAGN7qDB+t=KSQKUYh5sT6+T-UOdM1aSHA9+p0mOeUFe2RsfQUA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com> wrote: > This text is in the addHitRegion text: > > *"User agents are encouraged to make use of the information present in a * > *canvas** element's **hit region list* > <http://www.w3.org/TR/2dcontext/#hit-region-list>* to improve the > accessibility of **canvas** elements."* > > Encouraged is in no way a must which makes it difficult to justify a > normative test. > yes, it would not be a normative test, but it will show that a particular implementation is accessible. Maybe we can revisit this for the level 2 spec. A11y is not something that can be optionally implemented if you want a compliant canvas implementation. > > ----- Forwarded by Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM on 09/29/2014 10:32 AM > ----- > > From: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS > To: mark.sadecki@gmail.com > Cc: Canvas <public-canvas-api@w3.org>, "Rik Cabanier" <cabanier@gmail.com> > Date: 09/29/2014 10:28 AM > Subject: addHitRegion does not have an inform the user section. > ------------------------------ > > > > So, there is nothing the spec. that says to inform the user when a hit > region is associated with a control. It only says this for > drawFocusIfNeeded. > > Did someone drop the ball? This was discussed on the calls. ... Otherwise, > why would we have pushed for addHitRegion? > > I have stopped writing testable statements until this is resolved. > > Rich > > > Rich Schwerdtfeger > >
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2014 06:56:47 UTC