- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:33:13 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- cc: Dominic Mazzoni <dmazzoni@google.com>, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>, Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>, "public-canvas-api@w3.org" <public-canvas-api@w3.org>, Mark Sadecki <mark@w3.org>, Jay Munro <jaymunro@microsoft.com>
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote: > > One concern I have about the current hit region spec-- Could we _please_ keep discussion of the hit region stuff to the WHATWG list? It's bad enough that the focus discussion happened over here and thus caused a forking of the specs and a huge confusion for authors and delayed implementations and so on. Let's not make the same mistake again with addHitRegion(). If you want to discuss it, please discuss it where it was designed, so that we don't have multiple forks again. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 17 February 2014 16:33:41 UTC