On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Sun, 16 Feb 2014, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote: > > > > One concern I have about the current hit region spec-- > > Could we _please_ keep discussion of the hit region stuff to the WHATWG > list? It's bad enough that the focus discussion happened over here and > thus caused a forking of the specs and a huge confusion for authors and > delayed implementations and so on. The WHATWG spec forked focus rings after 3 browser vendors and the a11y people had consensus on drawFocusIfNeeded and there were 2 implementations. That gave some people cold feet and we had to start over. IMO the approach with drawFocusIfNeeded is still very sensible, especially now that I implemented part of the hit region spec. > Let's not make the same mistake again > with addHitRegion(). > > If you want to discuss it, please discuss it where it was designed, so > that we don't have multiple forks again. > We have the same and additional people on this mailing list as well as a weekly meeting that is scribed so it makes sense to keep it here. The Whatwg list can be included but you have objected to cross-posting in the past.
Received on Monday, 17 February 2014 18:25:05 UTC