- From: paniz alipour <alipourpaniz@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 18:27:36 +0430
- To: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
- Cc: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, cyns@exchange.microsoft.com, david.bolter@gmail.com, franko@microsoft.com, Mike@w3.org, public-canvas-api@w3.org, public-html@w3.org, public-html-a11y@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CADfq16gUdLZo22R50okGrseXieKVmsvRUk3VWZGHzzQD1VcMWA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Charles, *They can be marked up with form elements or with general html elements **and WAI-ARIA roles in the shadow dom.* These can be implemented in IE9? Also Can I see those widget type are they as web widget ,are they as usual or no have some incredible design? Thanks On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote: > ** > Paniz, > > Along with my team, I've implemented all of these widget types in Canvas. > They can be marked up with form elements or with general html elements > and WAI-ARIA roles in the shadow dom. > > There is an issue, however: currently, ATs are not made aware of the > bounding > rectangles of such elements until/unless the element is in focus. > > Other than that, they work the same as other widgets, and supply the same > information to the OS. > > -Charles > > > On 7/7/2011 6:41 AM, paniz alipour wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > I mean for example I have an interaction UI on canvas as like web pages, > > textbox,radiobutton ,checkbox,.... .I want to know these elements that > are drawn or are images on canvas > > could be incredible,Of course they can but in your opinion how many > percent it is possible(forexample checkbox with height 70 and width 70) > > Best Regards > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>wrote: > >> Hi Paniz, >> >> I am not quite following you. Could you please provide more detail? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Rich >> >> >> Rich Schwerdtfeger >> CTO Accessibility Software Group >> >> [image: Inactive hide details for paniz alipour ---07/07/2011 06:32:18 >> AM---Hello to all, Maybe you think that this question is not rel]paniz >> alipour ---07/07/2011 06:32:18 AM---Hello to all, Maybe you think that this >> question is not related to this discussion, >> >> From: paniz alipour <alipourpaniz@gmail.com> >> To: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS >> Cc: chuck@jumis.com, franko@microsoft.com, Mike@w3.org, >> david.bolter@gmail.com, cyns@exchange.microsoft.com, >> public-canvas-api@w3.org, public-html-a11y@w3.org, public-html@w3.org >> Date: 07/07/2011 06:32 AM >> >> Subject: Re: hit testing and retained graphics >> ------------------------------ >> >> >> >> Hello to all, >> >> Maybe you think that this question is not related to this discussion, >> >> But I want to know whether the web widget that are located on canvas, >> >> are they incredible .I mean a check box with height 70,weight 70, >> >> or no it will design as the common web widget on websites? >> >> Thanks >> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Richard Schwerdtfeger <* >> schwer@us.ibm.com* <schwer@us.ibm.com>> wrote: >> >> Charles, Frank, Mike, >> >> I am back from vacation. How far do we need to go with hit testing? >> Right now I am looking at associating a closed draw path with a DOM object >> in the canvas subtree. We would then need to address the routing of pointing >> device input events to the DOM object. The drawing path can be used to >> provide bound information to platform accessibility API. >> >> Do we need to bind any other drawing properties to the canvas object - >> similar to the way device context's are handled on graphic subsystems like >> Windows? >> >> Mike, I am including you as before I went on vacation you indicated >> that a number of developers desired this feature and wanted to be involved. >> >> Rich >> >> >> Rich Schwerdtfeger >> CTO Accessibility Software Group >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Paniz Alipour >> > > > > -- > Paniz Alipour > > > -- Paniz Alipour
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: 01-part
Received on Thursday, 7 July 2011 13:58:06 UTC