- From: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 06:51:50 -0700
- To: paniz alipour <alipourpaniz@gmail.com>
- CC: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, cyns@exchange.microsoft.com, david.bolter@gmail.com, franko@microsoft.com, Mike@w3.org, public-canvas-api@w3.org, public-html@w3.org, public-html-a11y@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4E15B9F6.8020907@jumis.com>
Paniz, Along with my team, I've implemented all of these widget types in Canvas. They can be marked up with form elements or with general html elements and WAI-ARIA roles in the shadow dom. There is an issue, however: currently, ATs are not made aware of the bounding rectangles of such elements until/unless the element is in focus. Other than that, they work the same as other widgets, and supply the same information to the OS. -Charles On 7/7/2011 6:41 AM, paniz alipour wrote: > Hi Richard, > > I mean for example I have an interaction UI on canvas as like web pages, > > textbox,radiobutton ,checkbox,.... .I want to know these elements that > are drawn or are images on canvas > > could be incredible,Of course they can but in your opinion how many > percent it is possible(forexample checkbox with height 70 and width 70) > > Best Regards > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Richard Schwerdtfeger > <schwer@us.ibm.com <mailto:schwer@us.ibm.com>> wrote: > > Hi Paniz, > > I am not quite following you. Could you please provide more detail? > > Thanks, > > > Rich > > > Rich Schwerdtfeger > CTO Accessibility Software Group > > Inactive hide details for paniz alipour ---07/07/2011 06:32:18 > AM---Hello to all, Maybe you think that this question is not > relpaniz alipour ---07/07/2011 06:32:18 AM---Hello to all, Maybe > you think that this question is not related to this discussion, > > From: paniz alipour <alipourpaniz@gmail.com > <mailto:alipourpaniz@gmail.com>> > To: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS > Cc: chuck@jumis.com <mailto:chuck@jumis.com>, franko@microsoft.com > <mailto:franko@microsoft.com>, Mike@w3.org <mailto:Mike@w3.org>, > david.bolter@gmail.com <mailto:david.bolter@gmail.com>, > cyns@exchange.microsoft.com <mailto:cyns@exchange.microsoft.com>, > public-canvas-api@w3.org <mailto:public-canvas-api@w3.org>, > public-html-a11y@w3.org <mailto:public-html-a11y@w3.org>, > public-html@w3.org <mailto:public-html@w3.org> > Date: 07/07/2011 06:32 AM > > Subject: Re: hit testing and retained graphics > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Hello to all, > > Maybe you think that this question is not related to this discussion, > > But I want to know whether the web widget that are located on canvas, > > are they incredible .I mean a check box with height 70,weight 70, > > or no it will design as the common web widget on websites? > > Thanks > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Richard Schwerdtfeger > <_schwer@us.ibm.com_ <mailto:schwer@us.ibm.com>> wrote: > > Charles, Frank, Mike, > > I am back from vacation. How far do we need to go with hit > testing? Right now I am looking at associating a closed draw > path with a DOM object in the canvas subtree. We would then > need to address the routing of pointing device input events > to the DOM object. The drawing path can be used to provide > bound information to platform accessibility API. > > Do we need to bind any other drawing properties to the > canvas object - similar to the way device context's are > handled on graphic subsystems like Windows? > > Mike, I am including you as before I went on vacation you > indicated that a number of developers desired this feature > and wanted to be involved. > > Rich > > > Rich Schwerdtfeger > CTO Accessibility Software Group > > > > > > -- > Paniz Alipour > > > > > -- > Paniz Alipour
Received on Thursday, 7 July 2011 13:52:22 UTC