Re: All-day WG meeting in May

Before I go ahead and set everything up are we still planning on having the
usual WG meeting?

We have a request from Bocoup to talk about AT-Driver and I am wondering if
we should show the finalised roadmap to those who can't make the meeting.

David

On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 3:03 PM Henrik Skupin <hskupin@mozilla.com> wrote:

> Mathias Bynens wrote on 30.05.23 13:51:
>
> Hi all,
>
> > Based on the responses here I think a face-to-face meeting is unlikely
> > to happen. Still, I think it would be useful to have a dedicated remote
> > meeting to specifically discuss the roadmap
> > <https://github.com/w3c/webdriver-bidi/issues/403> for longer than fits
> > our regular meetings. Perhaps 3 hours is sufficient.
> >
> > Riffing on Maksim’s proposed time slot, who would be interested in a
> > remote meeting @ *Wednesday 2023-06-14 12:00–15:00 UTC (14:00–17:00 CET,
> > 05:00–08:00 AM PDT)* with the specific goal to nail down next steps
> > w.r.t. the roadmap?
>
> We discussed internally and this sounds fine for Mozilla folks. Lets
> have the meeting at the proposed time.
>
> Henrik
>
> >
> > On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 11:56 AM Philip Jägenstedt <foolip@google.com
> > <mailto:foolip@google.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     I also think it would be valuable to meet for a longer discussion
> >     than we can fit in the regular WG meetings. Like Maksim, I think the
> >     roadmap is the most important thing, and it was very productive when
> >     we worked on that in Berlin last time.,
> >
> >     On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 10:53 AM Maksim Sadym <sadym@google.com
> >     <mailto:sadym@google.com>> wrote:
> >
> >         The primary purpose of the meeting is to allocate a specific
> >         time and venue for focused discussions, making tangible
> >         progress, and ideally reaching a consensus on extending our
> >         shared roadmap
> >         <https://github.com/w3c/webdriver-bidi/issues/403>. If there are
> >         concerns about the logistics of physical hubs, we can opt for a
> >         fully-remote meeting format.
> >
> >         Alternatively, we can continue with the iterative approach using
> >         GitHub issues and regular working group meetings, which would be
> >         more accommodating to participants across different time zones.
> >         However, it's important to note that this alternative approach
> >         may potentially extend the overall timeline of the process.
> >
> >         Looking forward to inputs from other participants about their
> >         preferences.
> >
> >         On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 12:41 PM David Burns
> >         <david.b@browserstack.com <mailto:david.b@browserstack.com>>
> wrote:
> >
> >             I didn't see this in the agenda otherwise would have sorted
> >             it first so me not being there for part of the meeting seems
> >             unrelated.
> >
> >             We haven't come to a conclusion. I know a lot of people
> >             can't travel for just one day so do we see value in a 1 day
> >             meeting still or continuing with our monthly meetings? Would
> >             there be value in increasing the cadence of these meetings
> >             to be fortnightly?
> >
> >             David
> >
> >             On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 10:53 AM Sam Sneddon
> >             <gsnedders@apple.com <mailto:gsnedders@apple.com>> wrote:
> >
> >                 Did we ever come to a conclusion here? This appears to
> >                 be the latest suggestion, but we never decided whether
> >                 or not we’re actually doing this, and David skipping
> >                 much of the meeting yesterday probably didn’t help.
> >
> >                 /Sam
> >
> >>                 On 13 Apr 2023, at 10:25, Maksim Sadym
> >>                 <sadym@google.com <mailto:sadym@google.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>                 As discussed yesterday during our monthly WG meeting,
> >>                 we have an updated suggestion for the all-day WG
> >>                 meeting 2023Q2:
> >>
> >>                 1. Date and time: 2023-06-14 12:00 UTC (14:00 CET, 5
> >>                 am PDT). We are open for other dates and times.
> >>                 2. As usual, remote-friendly.
> >>                 3. We would gladly host a hub in Berlin or Munich.
> >>                 4. Hubs in other locations are very welcome (London?,
> >>                 SF?).
> >>                 5. Agenda to be discussed.
> >>
> >>                 On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 6:19 PM Patrick Angle
> >>                 <pangle@apple.com <mailto:pangle@apple.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>                     The spring has in past years been an incredibly
> >>                     busy time for me and my coworker as historically
> >>                     we have held our developer’s conference in early
> >>                     June (although I do not know when it will be this
> >>                     year, I await the public announcement like anyone
> >>                     else). So dedicating a full day to anything is
> >>                     very difficult until the second half of June most
> >>                     years.
> >>
> >>                     Keen on the idea of another virtual F2F though,
> >>                     and scheduling difficulties aside I'd also be
> >>                     happy to participate!
> >>
> >>                     – Patrick
> >>
> >>                     > On Mar 27, 2023, at 7:13 AM, James Graham
> >>                     <james@hoppipolla.co.uk
> >>                     <mailto:james@hoppipolla.co.uk>> wrote:
> >>                     >
> >>                     > On 21/03/2023 10:58, Maksim Sadym wrote:
> >>                     >> Good morning dear colleagues!
> >>                     >> Last all-day WG meetings were super productive,
> >>                     both in Berlin and in Vancouver. And as such, we
> >>                     suggest planning another in May or June. We are
> >>                     happy to host those who want to attend in-person
> >>                     in our offices in Munich or Berlin. Of course it
> >>                     will be online-friendly.
> >>                     >> We suggest the *4th of May* (/may the force.../).
> >>                     >> Please let us know if you would like to join
> >>                     virtually or in-person, and in which location if
> >>                     in-person.
> >>                     >
> >>                     > We're excited about keeping the momentum going
> >>                     for BiDi.
> >>                     >
> >>                     > International travel for a single day meeting is
> >>                     quite hard to justify. On the other hand, having a
> >>                     full day virtual meeting in the late spring sounds
> >>                     like a good opportunity to make more progress, and
> >>                     we'd be happy to participate.
> >>                     >
> >>                     > In terms of date, I think we are quite flexible,
> >>                     however it would be good to pick one that works
> >>                     for as many WG participants as possible.
> >>                     >
> >>                     > I also note that there's a W3C TPAC planned for
> >>                     September. I hope we're able to organize a
> >>                     BTT/WebDriver F2F at that meeting.
> >>                     >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>                 --
> >>                 Maksim Sadym
> >>                 Software Engineer
> >>                 sadym@google.com <mailto:sadym@google.com>
> >>                 +49 157 54803490 <tel:+49%201575%204803490>
> >>
> >>                 Google Germany GmbH
> >>                 Erika-Mann-Straße 33
> >>                 80636 München
> >>
> >>                 Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Liana Sebastian
> >>                 Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
> >>                 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
> >>
> >>                 Diese E-Mail ist vertraulich. Falls Sie diese
> >>                 fälschlicherweise erhalten haben sollten, leiten Sie
> >>                 diese bitte nicht an jemand anderes weiter, löschen
> >>                 Sie alle Kopien und Anhänge davon und lassen Sie mich
> >>                 bitte wissen, dass die E-Mail an die falsche Person
> >>                 gesendet wurde.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>                 This e-mail is confidential. If you received this
> >>                 communication by mistake, please don't forward it to
> >>                 anyone else, please erase all copies and attachments,
> >>                 and please let me know that it has gone to the wrong
> >>                 person.
> >
> >
> >
> >             --
> >             David
> >
> >
> >
> >         --
> >
> >         Maksim Sadym
> >
> >         Software Engineer
> >
> >         sadym@google.com <mailto:sadym@google.com>
> >         +49 157 54803490 <tel:+49%201575%204803490>
> >
> >
> >         Google Germany GmbH
> >
> >         Erika-Mann-Straße 33
> >
> >         80636 München
> >
> >
> >         Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Liana Sebastian
> >
> >         Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
> >
> >         Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
> >
> >
> >         Diese E-Mail ist vertraulich. Falls Sie diese fälschlicherweise
> >         erhalten haben sollten, leiten Sie diese bitte nicht an jemand
> >         anderes weiter, löschen Sie alle Kopien und Anhänge davon und
> >         lassen Sie mich bitte wissen, dass die E-Mail an die falsche
> >         Person gesendet wurde.
> >
> >
> >
> >         This e-mail is confidential. If you received this communication
> >         by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, please erase
> >         all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it has
> >         gone to the wrong person.
> >
>
> --
> Henrik Skupin
> Staff Software Engineer
> Mozilla Corporation
>
>

-- 
David

Received on Wednesday, 7 June 2023 10:34:25 UTC