Re: All-day WG meeting in May

I also think it would be valuable to meet for a longer discussion than we
can fit in the regular WG meetings. Like Maksim, I think the roadmap is the
most important thing, and it was very productive when we worked on that in
Berlin last time.,

On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 10:53 AM Maksim Sadym <sadym@google.com> wrote:

> The primary purpose of the meeting is to allocate a specific time and
> venue for focused discussions, making tangible progress, and ideally
> reaching a consensus on extending our shared roadmap
> <https://github.com/w3c/webdriver-bidi/issues/403>. If there are concerns
> about the logistics of physical hubs, we can opt for a fully-remote meeting
> format.
>
> Alternatively, we can continue with the iterative approach using GitHub
> issues and regular working group meetings, which would be more
> accommodating to participants across different time zones. However, it's
> important to note that this alternative approach may potentially extend the
> overall timeline of the process.
>
> Looking forward to inputs from other participants about their preferences.
>
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 12:41 PM David Burns <david.b@browserstack.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I didn't see this in the agenda otherwise would have sorted it first so
>> me not being there for part of the meeting seems unrelated.
>>
>> We haven't come to a conclusion. I know a lot of people can't travel for
>> just one day so do we see value in a 1 day meeting still or continuing with
>> our monthly meetings? Would there be value in increasing the cadence of
>> these meetings to be fortnightly?
>>
>> David
>>
>> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 10:53 AM Sam Sneddon <gsnedders@apple.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Did we ever come to a conclusion here? This appears to be the latest
>>> suggestion, but we never decided whether or not we’re actually doing this,
>>> and David skipping much of the meeting yesterday probably didn’t help.
>>>
>>> /Sam
>>>
>>> On 13 Apr 2023, at 10:25, Maksim Sadym <sadym@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> As discussed yesterday during our monthly WG meeting, we have an updated
>>> suggestion for the all-day WG meeting 2023Q2:
>>>
>>> 1. Date and time: 2023-06-14 12:00 UTC (14:00 CET, 5 am PDT). We are
>>> open for other dates and times.
>>> 2. As usual, remote-friendly.
>>> 3. We would gladly host a hub in Berlin or Munich.
>>> 4. Hubs in other locations are very welcome (London?, SF?).
>>> 5. Agenda to be discussed.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 6:19 PM Patrick Angle <pangle@apple.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The spring has in past years been an incredibly busy time for me and my
>>>> coworker as historically we have held our developer’s conference in early
>>>> June (although I do not know when it will be this year, I await the public
>>>> announcement like anyone else). So dedicating a full day to anything is
>>>> very difficult until the second half of June most years.
>>>>
>>>> Keen on the idea of another virtual F2F though, and scheduling
>>>> difficulties aside I'd also be happy to participate!
>>>>
>>>> – Patrick
>>>>
>>>> > On Mar 27, 2023, at 7:13 AM, James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > On 21/03/2023 10:58, Maksim Sadym wrote:
>>>> >> Good morning dear colleagues!
>>>> >> Last all-day WG meetings were super productive, both in Berlin and
>>>> in Vancouver. And as such, we suggest planning another in May or June. We
>>>> are happy to host those who want to attend in-person in our offices in
>>>> Munich or Berlin. Of course it will be online-friendly.
>>>> >> We suggest the *4th of May* (/may the force.../).
>>>> >> Please let us know if you would like to join virtually or in-person,
>>>> and in which location if in-person.
>>>> >
>>>> > We're excited about keeping the momentum going for BiDi.
>>>> >
>>>> > International travel for a single day meeting is quite hard to
>>>> justify. On the other hand, having a full day virtual meeting in the late
>>>> spring sounds like a good opportunity to make more progress, and we'd be
>>>> happy to participate.
>>>> >
>>>> > In terms of date, I think we are quite flexible, however it would be
>>>> good to pick one that works for as many WG participants as possible.
>>>> >
>>>> > I also note that there's a W3C TPAC planned for September. I hope
>>>> we're able to organize a BTT/WebDriver F2F at that meeting.
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Maksim Sadym
>>> Software Engineer
>>> sadym@google.com
>>> +49 157 54803490 <+49%201575%204803490>
>>>
>>> Google Germany GmbH
>>> Erika-Mann-Straße 33
>>> 80636 München
>>>
>>> Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Liana Sebastian
>>> Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
>>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
>>>
>>> Diese E-Mail ist vertraulich. Falls Sie diese fälschlicherweise erhalten
>>> haben sollten, leiten Sie diese bitte nicht an jemand anderes weiter,
>>> löschen Sie alle Kopien und Anhänge davon und lassen Sie mich bitte wissen,
>>> dass die E-Mail an die falsche Person gesendet wurde.
>>>
>>>
>>> This e-mail is confidential. If you received this communication by
>>> mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, please erase all copies
>>> and attachments, and please let me know that it has gone to the wrong
>>> person.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> David
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Maksim Sadym
>
> Software Engineer
>
> sadym@google.com
> +49 157 54803490 <+49%201575%204803490>
>
> Google Germany GmbH
>
> Erika-Mann-Straße 33
>
> 80636 München
>
> Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Liana Sebastian
>
> Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
>
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
>
> Diese E-Mail ist vertraulich. Falls Sie diese fälschlicherweise erhalten
> haben sollten, leiten Sie diese bitte nicht an jemand anderes weiter,
> löschen Sie alle Kopien und Anhänge davon und lassen Sie mich bitte wissen,
> dass die E-Mail an die falsche Person gesendet wurde.
>
>
>
> This e-mail is confidential. If you received this communication by
> mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, please erase all copies
> and attachments, and please let me know that it has gone to the wrong
> person.
>