- From: Mathias Bynens <mths@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 10:31:51 +0200
- To: Brandon Walderman <brwalder@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Philip Jägenstedt <foolip@google.com>, Sam Sneddon <gsnedders@apple.com>, James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk>, "public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org" <public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADizRgZnqWf2t5DwiL4MrdFOn8MDXc3BGaY=1_GYr6H4Jt0GbA@mail.gmail.com>
Now that August 9th has passed, what’s the decision? On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 6:13 PM Brandon Walderman <brwalder@microsoft.com> wrote: > Microsoft won't be able to attend. However, we'd also prefer this as an > official WG meeting, or at least one with the notes publicly available so > that we can follow any outcomes and discussions. > > Thanks, > Brandon > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Philip Jägenstedt <foolip@google.com> > *Sent:* Monday, August 8, 2022 4:38 AM > *To:* Sam Sneddon <gsnedders@apple.com> > *Cc:* James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk>; > public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org <public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org> > *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: Automation Summit in Berlin [action required > from implementors by 9 August] > > Alright, since Apple would be happier with this as an official WG meeting, > we (Google) are good with this. Let's follow up on organizing another WG > meeting after this. > > David, to confirm explicitly, I can confirm that some Googlers can attend, > no concerns from us. > > Best regards, > Philip > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 8:48 PM Sam Sneddon <gsnedders@apple.com> wrote: > > > > On 5 Aug 2022, at 14:29, James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk> wrote: > > > > To be concrete, my proposal at this point (which I think agrees with > what foolip said) is: > > > > * The SauceLabs meetup returns to its original scope as a chance to work > with Selenium implementors on BiDi support. It is not a WG meeting, just a > chance to talk to that constituency and gather feedback on our progress. > > > > * Since there appears to be interest in a F2F in Europe, especially > given the limited in-person attendance at TPAC, we begin the process of > planning a formal F2F meeting in Europe. This would not be earlier than > October (but could be later; date, location, etc. to be decided among the > group). > > > > As mentioned before, we would be much happier with an actual WG meeting, > bound by normal W3C participation rules (per Process). Given the relatively > close relationship between Selenium and WebDriver, it seems comparatively > plausible that non-participants will end up recommending changes to BiDi, > and these changes should go through the normal process with license grants > etc. > > Additionally, we still have some concern if the majority of browser-side > implementers are represented at the Sauce Labs hosted meeting and the > extent to which it may practically become a WG meeting, regardless of the > intent. > > /Sam > >
Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2022 08:32:16 UTC